And clarify our potential use of it as a starting point for writing
memory poisoning tests from scratch.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
In light of choosing Valgrind/ASan over mprotect()-based poisoning,
update the detailed design of copy validation.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
lcov.sh can now be called from any build directory and
also still works with in-place builds too.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Daubney <thomas.daubney@arm.com>
- rename file name from `early_data.txt` to `tls13_early_data.txt`
- fix typo issue
- remove redundant parameter
Signed-off-by: Jerry Yu <jerry.h.yu@arm.com>
Main changes:
* New tests are easier to write than first stated
* Use of existing tests is ledd beneficial
* But using existing tests is a benefit if it can be done transparently
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
Coverity flagged this due to the potential leaked memory allocations in
mbedtls_mps_reader_random_usage()
Signed-off-by: Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@arm.com>
Consider MSan, ASan and Valgrind as options for implementing memory
poisoning tests. Come to the altered conclusion that Valgrind is the
best option.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
* Remove references to the platform - this is unlikely to affect whether
copies are optimized.
* Note that the evaluation should test extreme optimisation settings.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
Using a dedicated field allows clean separatin between key attributes
and slot state. This allows us to use the same mechanics for attributes
and key content. Which in turn means lower code size and easier
maintenance.
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
Separate design analysis from plans and make the distinction clear
between what is implemented, what is planned to be implemented soon,
what is planned to be implemented in the future, and what is ideas that
are rejected.
(The distinction between the last two categories doesn't have to be
clear, we can't and shouldn't plan that far ahead.)
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
Add repository detection (credit to davidhorstmann-arm
for adding this in all.sh previously) and use repository
detection to set the library directory and title
variables.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Daubney <thomas.daubney@arm.com>
These are explicitly PSA tests, so use PSA_WANT.
Was missed by analyze_outcomes.py because those test cases were not
listed properly, which will be fixed by #8088.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
There are some fallback test cases which should rely on builtin
implementations. This commit adjusts them with correct dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Yanray Wang <yanray.wang@arm.com>
PBKDF2-AES-CMAC works if we provide the driver of AES-CMAC or
KEY-TYPE-AES or both. So if PBKDF2-AES-CMAC is requested via PSA,
we don't need to additionally enable builtin AES-CMAC or builtin
KEY-TYPE-AES.
Signed-off-by: Yanray Wang <yanray.wang@arm.com>
