mirror of
https://github.com/Kitware/CMake.git
synced 2025-10-24 03:02:46 +08:00
Help: describe differences between macro and function.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ details.
|
||||
See the :command:`cmake_policy()` command documentation for the behavior
|
||||
of policies inside functions.
|
||||
|
||||
See the :command:`macro()` command documentation for differences
|
||||
between CMake functions and macros.
|
||||
|
||||
Invocation
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ argument of the opening ``macro`` command.
|
||||
See the :command:`cmake_policy()` command documentation for the behavior
|
||||
of policies inside macros.
|
||||
|
||||
See the :ref:`Macro vs Function` section below for differences
|
||||
between CMake macros and :command:`functions <function>`.
|
||||
|
||||
Invocation
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -65,13 +68,36 @@ behavior. Checking that ``${ARGC}`` is greater than ``#`` is the only
|
||||
way to ensure that ``${ARGV#}`` was passed to the function as an extra
|
||||
argument.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _`Macro vs Function`:
|
||||
|
||||
Macro vs Function
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
The ``macro`` command is very similar to the :command:`function` command.
|
||||
Nonetheless, there are a few important differences.
|
||||
|
||||
In a function, ``ARGC``, ``ARGC`` and ``ARGV0``, ``ARGV1``, ... are
|
||||
true variables in the usual CMake sense. In a macro, they are not.
|
||||
They are string replacements much like the C preprocessor would do
|
||||
with a macro. This has a number of consequences, as explained in
|
||||
the :ref:`Argument Caveats` section below.
|
||||
|
||||
Another difference between macros and functions is the control flow.
|
||||
A function is executed by transfering control from the calling
|
||||
statement to the function body. A macro is executed as if the macro
|
||||
body were pasted in place of the calling statement. This has for
|
||||
consequence that a :command:`return()` in a macro body does not
|
||||
just terminate execution of the macro; rather, control is returned
|
||||
from the scope of the macro call. To avoid confusion, it is recommended
|
||||
to avoid :command:`return()` in macros altogether.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _`Argument Caveats`:
|
||||
|
||||
Argument Caveats
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the parameters to a macro and values such as ``ARGN`` are
|
||||
not variables in the usual CMake sense. They are string
|
||||
replacements much like the C preprocessor would do with a macro.
|
||||
Therefore you will NOT be able to use commands like
|
||||
Since ``ARGC``, ``ARGC``, ``ARGV0`` etc are not variables,
|
||||
you will NOT be able to use commands like
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: cmake
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -80,12 +106,11 @@ Therefore you will NOT be able to use commands like
|
||||
if(ARGC GREATER 2) # ARGC is not a variable
|
||||
foreach(loop_var IN LISTS ARGN) # ARGN is not a variable
|
||||
|
||||
In the first case, you can use ``if(${ARGV1})``.
|
||||
In the second and third case, the proper way to check if an optional
|
||||
variable was passed to the macro is to use ``if(${ARGC} GREATER 2)``.
|
||||
In the last case, you can use ``foreach(loop_var ${ARGN})`` but this
|
||||
will skip empty arguments.
|
||||
If you need to include them, you can use
|
||||
In the first case, you can use ``if(${ARGV1})``. In the second and
|
||||
third case, the proper way to check if an optional variable was
|
||||
passed to the macro is to use ``if(${ARGC} GREATER 2)``. In the
|
||||
last case, you can use ``foreach(loop_var ${ARGN})`` but this will
|
||||
skip empty arguments. If you need to include them, you can use
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: cmake
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user