llvm/libcxx
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/llvm-mirror/libcxx.git synced 2025-10-23 18:38:30 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Mark LWG#2358 as done

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@283341 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Marshall Clow
2016-10-05 17:02:43 +00:00
parent aead8da085
commit 3d19a9da96
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
www/upcoming_meeting.html
View File

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2221">2221</a></td><td>No formatted output operator for nullptr</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2221">2221</a></td><td>No formatted output operator for nullptr</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2223">2223</a></td><td>shrink_to_fit effect on iterator validity</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2223">2223</a></td><td>shrink_to_fit effect on iterator validity</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2261">2261</a></td><td>Are containers required to use their 'pointer' type internally?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2261">2261</a></td><td>Are containers required to use their 'pointer' type internally?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2358">2358</a></td><td>Apparently-bogus definition of is_empty type trait</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2358">2358</a></td><td>Apparently-bogus definition of is_empty type trait</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2394">2394</a></td><td>locale::name specification unclear - what is implementation-defined?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2394">2394</a></td><td>locale::name specification unclear - what is implementation-defined?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2460">2460</a></td><td>LWG issue 2408 and value categories</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2460">2460</a></td><td>LWG issue 2408 and value categories</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2468">2468</a></td><td>Self-move-assignment of library types</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2468">2468</a></td><td>Self-move-assignment of library types</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
<li>2221 - Patch and tests ready</li> <li>2221 - Patch and tests ready</li>
<li>2223 - </li> <li>2223 - </li>
<li>2261 - </li> <li>2261 - </li>
<li>2358 - </li> <li>2358 - We already do this; I improved the tests</li>
<li>2394 - </li> <li>2394 - </li>
<li>2460 - </li> <li>2460 - </li>
<li>2468 - </li> <li>2468 - </li>