This C++17 Core Language feature isn't necessary when testing std::byte.
It's a minor convenience, but it limits test coverage to very new compilers.
This part activates the tests for more compilers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@302945 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This C++17 Core Language feature isn't necessary when testing std::byte.
It's a minor convenience, but it limits test coverage to very new compilers.
This part changes the code.
Fixes D32386.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@302944 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch fixes the test failures and unexpected passes that occur
when testing against GCC 7. Specifically:
* don't mark __gcd as always inline because it's a recursive function. GCC diagnoses this.
* don't XFAIL the aligned allocation tests. GCC 7 supports them but not the -faligned-allocation option.
* Work around gcc.gnu.org/PR78489 in variants constructors.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@302488 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch implements exception_ptr on Windows using the `__ExceptionPtrFoo` functions provided by MSVC.
The `__ExceptionPtrFoo` functions are defined inside the C++ standard library, `msvcprt`, which is unfortunate because it requires libc++ to link to the MSVC STL. However this doesn't seem to cause any immediate problems. However to be safe I kept all usages within the libc++ dylib so that user programs wouldn't have to link to MSVCPRT as well.
Note there are still 2 outstanding exception_ptr/nested_exception test failures.
* `current_exception.pass.cpp` needs to be rewritten for the Windows exception_ptr semantics which copy the exception every time.
* `rethrow_if_nested.pass.cpp` need investigation. It hits a stack overflow, likely from recursion.
This patch also gets most of the `<future>` tests passing as well.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, compnerd, bcraig, rmaprath, majnemer, BillyONeal, STL_MSFT
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32927
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@302393 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Libc++ doesn't provide its own definitions of new/delete on Windows,
instead using the versions provided by VCRuntime. However VCRuntime
does not yet implement aligned new/delete so these tests fail.
It might be possible for libc++ to provide its own definitions only
for aligned new/delete as long as MSVC doesn't provide it. However
before this can be done libc++ needs to figure out how to implement
std::get_new_handler.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@302384 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Libc++ is used as a system library on macOS and iOS (amongst others). In order
for users to be able to compile a binary that is intended to be deployed to an
older version of the platform, clang provides the
availability attribute <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#availability>_
that can be placed on declarations to describe the lifecycle of a symbol in the
library.
See docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst for more information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@302172 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Back in r240527 I added a knob to prevent thread-unsafe functions from
being exposed. mblen(), mbtowc() and wctomb() were also added to this
list, as the latest issue of POSIX doesn't require these functions to be
thread-safe.
It turns out that the only circumstance in which these functions are not
thread-safe is in case they are used in combination with state-dependent
character sets (e.g., Shift-JIS). According to Austin Group Bug 708,
these character sets "[...] are mostly a relic of the past and which
were never supported on most POSIX systems".
Though in many cases the use of these functions can be prevented by
using the reentrant counterparts, they are the only functions that allow
you to query whether the locale's character set is state-dependent. This
means that omitting these functions removes actual functionality.
Let's be a bit less pedantic and drop the guards around these functions.
Links:
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=708http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2037.htm
Reviewed by: ericwf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21436
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@290748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/input.streams/istream.unformatted/get.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because basic_istream::get() returns int_type (N4606 27.7.2.3 [istream.unformatted]/4).
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/output.streams/ostream.formatted/ostream.inserters.arithmetic/minus1.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because toupper() returns int (C11 7.4.2.2/1).
test/std/iterators/stream.iterators/ostream.iterator/ostream.iterator.ops/assign_t.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally writing doubles to ostream_iterator<int>.
It's silencing -Wliteral-conversion for Clang, so I'm adding C4244 silencing for MSVC.
test/std/language.support/support.limits/limits/numeric.limits.members/infinity.pass.cpp
Given `extern float zero;`, the expression `1./zero` has type double, which emits a truncation warning
when being passed to test<float>() taking float. The fix is to say `1.f/zero` which has type float.
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/arg.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/norm.pass.cpp
These tests were constructing std::complex<double>(x, 0), emitting truncation warnings when x is long long.
Saying static_cast<double>(x) avoids this.
test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/seed_result_type.pass.cpp
This was using `int s` to construct and seed a linear_congruential_engine<T, stuff>, where T is
unsigned short/unsigned int/unsigned long/unsigned long long. That emits a truncation warning in the
unsigned short case. Because the range [0, 20) is tiny and we aren't doing anything else with the index,
we can just iterate with `T s`.
test/std/re/re.traits/value.pass.cpp
regex_traits<wchar_t>::value()'s first parameter is wchar_t (N4606 28.7 [re.traits]/13). This loop is
using int to iterate through ['g', 0xFFFF), emitting a truncation warning from int to wchar_t
(which is 16-bit for some of us). Because the bound is exclusive, we can just iterate with wchar_t.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/size_char_alloc.pass.cpp
This test is a little strange. It's trying to verify that basic_string's (InIt, InIt) range constructor
isn't confused by "N copies of C" when N and C have the same integral type. To do this, it was
testing (100, 65), but that eventually emits truncation warnings from int to char. There's a simple way
to avoid this - passing (static_cast<char>(100), static_cast<char>(65)) also exercises the disambiguation.
(And 100 is representable even when char has a signed range.)
test/std/strings/string.view/string.view.hash/string_view.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char_type> because `'0' + i` has type int.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/bind/func.bind/func.bind.bind/nested.pass.cpp
What's more horrible than nested bind()? pow() overloads! This operator()(T a, T b) was assuming that
std::pow(a, b) can be returned as T. (In this case, T is int.) However, N4606 26.9.1 [cmath.syn]/2
says that pow(int, int) returns double, so this was truncating double to int.
Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/unord.hash/integral.pass.cpp
This was iterating `for (int i = 0; i <= 5; ++i)` and constructing `T t(i);` but that's truncating
when T is short. (And super truncating when T is bool.) Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/utility/exchange/exchange.pass.cpp
First, this was exchanging 67.2 into an int, but that's inherently truncating.
Changing this to static_cast<short>(67) avoids the truncation while preserving the
"what if T and U are different" test coverage.
Second, this was exchanging {} with the explicit type float into an int, and that's also
inherently truncating. Specifying short is just as good.
test/std/utilities/utility/pairs/pairs.spec/make_pair.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<short>. Note that this affects template argument deduction for make_pair(),
better fulfilling the test's intent. For example, this was saying
`typedef std::pair<int, short> P1; P1 p1 = std::make_pair(3, 4);` but that was asking
make_pair() to return pair<int, int>, which was then being converted to pair<int, short>.
(pair's converting constructors are tested elsewhere.)
Now, std::make_pair(3, static_cast<short>(4)) actually returns pair<int, short>.
(There's still a conversion from pair<nullptr_t, short> to pair<unique_ptr<int>, short>.)
Fixes D27544.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@289111 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add static_cast<std::size_t> to more comparisons. (Performed manually, unlike part 8/12.)
Also, include <cstddef> when it wasn't already being included.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@288746 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch implements the library side of P0035R4. The implementation is thanks to @rsmith.
In addition to the C++17 implementation, the library implementation can be explicitly turned on using `-faligned-allocation` in all dialects.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith
Subscribers: rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25591
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@284206 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch addresses the following issues in the test suite:
1. Move "std::bad_array_length" test from std/ to libcxx/ test directory
since the feature is not a part of the standard.
2. Rename "futures.tas" test directory to "futures.task" since that is the
correct stable name.
3. Move tests for "packaged_task<T>::result_type" from std/ to libcxx/
test directory since the typedef is a libc++ extension.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@271430 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format:
#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X
// Do test.
#else
// Empty test.
#endif
We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on
earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes
for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit
directives on the same tests.
Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@271108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
