The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@291035 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In the previous fix I used a PMF type as a semi-safe bool type in C++03.
However immediately after committing I realized clang offered explicit
conversion operators as an extension. This patch removes the old fix and
enables _LIBCPP_EXPLICIT using __has_extension instead.
This change also affects the following other classes, which have
'_LIBCPP_EXPLICIT operator bool()'.
* shared_ptr
* unique_ptr
* error_condition
* basic_ios
* function (already C++11 only)
* istream::sentry
* experimental::string_view.
In all of the above cases I believe it is safe to enable the extension, except
in the experimental::string_view case. There seem to be some Clang bugs
affecting the experimental::string_view conversion to std::basic_string. To
work around that I manually disabled _LIBCPP_EXPLICIT in that case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@290831 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There were two problems with the initial fix.
1. The added tests flushed out that we misconfigured _LIBCPP_EXPLICIT with GCC.
2. Because the boolean type was a member function template it caused weird link
errors. I'm assuming due to the vague linkage rules. This time the bool type
is a non-template member function pointer. That seems to have fixed the
failing tests. Plus it will end up generating less symbols overall, since
the bool type is no longer per instantiation.
original commit message below
-----------------------------
std::basic_ios has an operator bool(). In C++11 and later
it is explicit, and only allows contextual implicit conversions.
However explicit isn't available in C++03 which causes std::istream (et al)
to have an implicit conversion to int. This can easily cause ambiguities
when calling operator<< and operator>>.
This patch uses a "bool-like" type in C++03 to work around this. The
"bool-like" type is an arbitrary pointer to member function type. It
will not convert to either int or void*, but will convert to bool.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@290754 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
std::basic_ios has an operator bool(). In C++11 and later
it is explicit, and only allows contextual implicit conversions.
However explicit isn't available in C++03 which causes std::istream (et al)
to have an implicit conversion to int. This can easily cause ambiguities
when calling operator<< and operator>>.
This patch uses a "bool-like" type in C++03 to work around this. The
"bool-like" type is an arbitrary pointer to member function type. It
will not convert to either int or void*, but will convert to bool.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@290750 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
After putting this question up on cfe-dev I have decided that it would be best to allow the use of `<atomic>` in C++03. Although static initialization is a concern the syntax required to get it is C++11 only. Meaning that C++11 constant static initialization cannot silently break in C++03, it will always cause a syntax error. Furthermore `ATOMIC_VAR_INIT` and `ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT` remain defined in C++03 even though they cannot be used because C++03 usages will cause better error messages.
The main change in this patch is to replace `__has_feature(cxx_atomic)`, which only returns true when C++ >= 11, to `__has_extension(c_atomic)` which returns true whenever clang supports the required atomic builtins.
This patch adds the following macros:
* `_LIBCPP_HAS_C_ATOMIC_IMP` - Defined on clang versions which provide the C `_Atomic` keyword.
* `_LIBCPP_HAS_GCC_ATOMIC_IMP` - Defined on GCC > 4.7. We must use the fallback atomic implementation.
* `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ATOMIC_HEADER` - Defined when it is not safe to include `<atomic>`.
`_LIBCPP_HAS_C_ATOMIC_IMP` and `_LIBCPP_HAS_GCC_ATOMIC_IMP` are mutually exclusive, only one should be defined. If neither is defined then `<atomic>` is not implemented and including `<atomic>` will issue an error.
Reviewers: chandlerc, jroelofs, mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11555
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@245463 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
