This is the subject of an active NB comment. Regardless of what the Working
Paper currently says, asking this question is morally wrong, because the
answer can change when the type is completed. C1XX now detects such
precondition violations and complains about them; perhaps Clang should too.
Fixes D28591.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@292281 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The test was previously set to XFAIL if __cpp_structured_bindings
wasn't defined. However there are Clang 4.0 versions which do not
define this macro but do provide structured bindings, which causes
the test to pass unexpectedly.
This patch changes the XFAIL to an UNSUPPORTED.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@291060 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In ABI v1 libc++ implements std::pointer_safety as a class type instead
of an enumeration. However this class type does not provide
a default constructor as it should. This patch adds that default constructor.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@291059 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In the C++ standard `std::pointer_safety` is defined
as a C++11 strongly typed enum. However libc++ currently defines
it as a class type which simulates a C++11 enumeration. This
can be detected in valid C++ code.
This patch introduces an the _LIBCPP_ABI_POINTER_SAFETY_ENUM_TYPE ABI option.
When defined `std::pointer_safety` is implemented as an enum type.
Unfortunatly this also means it can no longer be provided as an extension
in C++03.
Additionally this patch moves the definition for `get_pointer_safety()`
out of the dylib, and into the headers. New usages of `get_pointer_safety()`
will now use the inline version instead of the dylib version. However in
order to keep the dylib ABI compatible the old definition is explicitly
compiled into it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@291046 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch attempts to re-implement a fix for LWG 2770, but not the actual specified PR.
The PR for 2770 specifies tuple_size<T const> as only conditionally providing a `::value` member. However C++17 structured bindings require `tuple_size<T const>` to be complete only if `tuple_size<T>` is also complete. Therefore this patch implements only provides the specialization `tuple_size<T CV>` iff `tuple_size<T>` is a complete type.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR31513.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, mpark
Subscribers: mpark, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28222
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@291019 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These tests were using malloc()'s return value without checking for null,
which MSVC's /analyze rightly warns about. Asserting that the pointer is
non-null both expresses the test's intention and silences the warning.
Fixes D27785.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@290921 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch implements the correct PR for LWG 2770. It also makes the primary
tuple_size template incomplete again which fixes part of llvm.org/PR31513.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@290846 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch reverts the changes to tuple which fixed construction from
types derived from tuple. It breaks the code mentioned in llvm.org/PR31384.
I'll follow this commit up with a test case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@289773 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The standard requires tuple have the following constructors:
```
tuple(tuple<OtherTypes...> const&);
tuple(tuple<OtherTypes...> &&);
tuple(pair<T1, T2> const&);
tuple(pair<T1, T2> &&);
tuple(array<T, N> const&);
tuple(array<T, N> &&);
```
However libc++ implements these as a single constructor with the signature:
```
template <class TupleLike, enable_if_t<__is_tuple_like<TupleLike>::value>>
tuple(TupleLike&&);
```
This causes the constructor to reject types derived from tuple-like types; Unlike if we had all of the concrete overloads, because they cause the derived->base conversion in the signature.
This patch fixes this issue by detecting derived types and the tuple-like base they are derived from. It does this by creating an overloaded function with signatures for each of tuple/pair/array and checking if the possibly derived type can convert to any of them.
This patch fixes [PR17550]( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17550)
This patch
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo, mpark, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27606
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@289727 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
test/support/test_macros.h
For convenience/greppability, add macros for libcxx-specific static_asserts about noexceptness.
(Moving the definitions of ASSERT_NOEXCEPT/ASSERT_NOT_NOEXCEPT isn't technically necessary
because they're macros, but I think it's better style to define stuff before using it.)
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.apply/apply.pass.cpp
There was a completely unused `TrackedCallable obj;`.
apply() isn't depicted with conditional noexcept in C++17.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.apply/make_from_tuple.pass.cpp
Now that we have LIBCPP_ASSERT_NOEXCEPT, use it.
Fixes D27622.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@289264 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch removes libc++'s tuple extension which allowed it to be
constructed from fewer initializers than elements; with the remaining
elements being default constructed. However the implicit version of
this extension breaks conforming code. For example:
int fun(std::string);
int fun(std::tuple<std::string, int>);
int x = fun("hello"); // ambigious
Because existing code may already depend on this extension it can be re-enabled
by defining _LIBCPP_ENABLE_TUPLE_IMPLICIT_REDUCED_ARITY_EXTENSION.
Note that the explicit version of this extension is still supported,
although it's somewhat less useful than the implicit one.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@289158 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/input.streams/istream.unformatted/get.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because basic_istream::get() returns int_type (N4606 27.7.2.3 [istream.unformatted]/4).
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/output.streams/ostream.formatted/ostream.inserters.arithmetic/minus1.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because toupper() returns int (C11 7.4.2.2/1).
test/std/iterators/stream.iterators/ostream.iterator/ostream.iterator.ops/assign_t.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally writing doubles to ostream_iterator<int>.
It's silencing -Wliteral-conversion for Clang, so I'm adding C4244 silencing for MSVC.
test/std/language.support/support.limits/limits/numeric.limits.members/infinity.pass.cpp
Given `extern float zero;`, the expression `1./zero` has type double, which emits a truncation warning
when being passed to test<float>() taking float. The fix is to say `1.f/zero` which has type float.
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/arg.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/norm.pass.cpp
These tests were constructing std::complex<double>(x, 0), emitting truncation warnings when x is long long.
Saying static_cast<double>(x) avoids this.
test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/seed_result_type.pass.cpp
This was using `int s` to construct and seed a linear_congruential_engine<T, stuff>, where T is
unsigned short/unsigned int/unsigned long/unsigned long long. That emits a truncation warning in the
unsigned short case. Because the range [0, 20) is tiny and we aren't doing anything else with the index,
we can just iterate with `T s`.
test/std/re/re.traits/value.pass.cpp
regex_traits<wchar_t>::value()'s first parameter is wchar_t (N4606 28.7 [re.traits]/13). This loop is
using int to iterate through ['g', 0xFFFF), emitting a truncation warning from int to wchar_t
(which is 16-bit for some of us). Because the bound is exclusive, we can just iterate with wchar_t.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/size_char_alloc.pass.cpp
This test is a little strange. It's trying to verify that basic_string's (InIt, InIt) range constructor
isn't confused by "N copies of C" when N and C have the same integral type. To do this, it was
testing (100, 65), but that eventually emits truncation warnings from int to char. There's a simple way
to avoid this - passing (static_cast<char>(100), static_cast<char>(65)) also exercises the disambiguation.
(And 100 is representable even when char has a signed range.)
test/std/strings/string.view/string.view.hash/string_view.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char_type> because `'0' + i` has type int.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/bind/func.bind/func.bind.bind/nested.pass.cpp
What's more horrible than nested bind()? pow() overloads! This operator()(T a, T b) was assuming that
std::pow(a, b) can be returned as T. (In this case, T is int.) However, N4606 26.9.1 [cmath.syn]/2
says that pow(int, int) returns double, so this was truncating double to int.
Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/unord.hash/integral.pass.cpp
This was iterating `for (int i = 0; i <= 5; ++i)` and constructing `T t(i);` but that's truncating
when T is short. (And super truncating when T is bool.) Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/utility/exchange/exchange.pass.cpp
First, this was exchanging 67.2 into an int, but that's inherently truncating.
Changing this to static_cast<short>(67) avoids the truncation while preserving the
"what if T and U are different" test coverage.
Second, this was exchanging {} with the explicit type float into an int, and that's also
inherently truncating. Specifying short is just as good.
test/std/utilities/utility/pairs/pairs.spec/make_pair.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<short>. Note that this affects template argument deduction for make_pair(),
better fulfilling the test's intent. For example, this was saying
`typedef std::pair<int, short> P1; P1 p1 = std::make_pair(3, 4);` but that was asking
make_pair() to return pair<int, int>, which was then being converted to pair<int, short>.
(pair's converting constructors are tested elsewhere.)
Now, std::make_pair(3, static_cast<short>(4)) actually returns pair<int, short>.
(There's still a conversion from pair<nullptr_t, short> to pair<unique_ptr<int>, short>.)
Fixes D27544.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@289111 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Instead of storing double in double and then truncating to int, store int in long
and then widen to long long. This preserves test coverage (as these tests are
interested in various tuple conversions) while avoiding truncation warnings.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/const_pair.pass.cpp
Since we aren't physically truncating anymore, t1 is equal to p0.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/convert_copy.pass.cpp
One edit is different from the usual pattern. Previously, we were storing
double in double and then converting to A, which has an implicitly converting
constructor from int. Now, we're storing int in int and then converting to A,
avoiding the truncation.
Fixes D27542.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@289109 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Change char to long and remove some char casts. This preserves test coverage for tuple's
heterogeneous comparisons, while avoiding int-to-char truncation warnings.
Fixes D27541.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@289108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These tests for some guy's transparent operator functors were needlessly truncating their
double results to int. Preserving the doubleness makes compilers happier. I'm following
existing practice by adding an "// exact in binary" comment when the result isn't a whole number.
(The changes from 6 to 6.0 and so forth are stylistic, not critical.)
Fixes D27539.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@289106 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/copy.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/copy_alloc.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/copy.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/copy_alloc.pass.cpp
Change "unsigned s = x.size();" to "typename C::size_type s = x.size();"
because that's what it returns.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/pointer_alloc.pass.cpp
Include <cstddef>, then change "unsigned n = T::length(s);"
to "std::size_t n = T::length(s);" because that's what char_traits returns.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/substr.pass.cpp
Change unsigned to typename S::size_type because that's what str.size() returns.
test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.cons/ull_ctor.pass.cpp
This was needlessly truncating std::size_t to unsigned.
It's being used to compare and initialize std::size_t.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@288753 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Use static_cast<int> when storing size_t in int (or passing size_t to int).
Also, remove a spurious semicolon in test/support/archetypes.hpp.
test/support/count_new.hpp
Additionally, change data members (and parameters) to size_t.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@288752 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Various changes:
test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.merge/inplace_merge.pass.cpp
This is comparing value_type to unsigned. value_type is sometimes int and sometimes struct S (implicitly constructible from int).
static_cast<value_type>(unsigned) silences the warning and doesn't do anything bad (as the values in question are small).
test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.nth.element/nth_element_comp.pass.cpp
This is comparing an int remote-element to size_t. The values in question are small and non-negative,
so either type is fine. I think that converting int to size_t is marginally better here than the reverse.
test/std/containers/sequences/deque/deque.cons/size.pass.cpp
DefaultOnly::count is int (and non-negative). When comparing to unsigned, use static_cast<unsigned>.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.access/index.pass.cpp
We're comparing char to '0' through '9', but formed with the type size_t. Add static_cast<char>.
test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.cons/ull_ctor.pass.cpp
Include <cstddef> for pedantic correctness (this test was already mentioning std::size_t).
"v[i] == (i & 1)" was comparing bool to size_t. Saying "v[i] == ((i & 1) != 0)" smashes the RHS to bool.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@288749 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch overhalls the libc++ test format/configuration in order to fully support modules. By "fully support" I mean get almost all of the tests passing. The main hurdle for doing this is handling tests that `#define _LIBCPP_FOO` macros to test a different configuration. This patch deals with these tests in the following ways:
1. For tests that define single `_LIBCPP_ABI_FOO` macros have been annotated with `// MODULES_DEFINES: _LIBCPP_ABI_FOO`. This allows the test suite to define the macro on the command line so it uses a different set of modules.
2. Tests for libc++'s debug mode (which define custom `_LIBCPP_ASSERT`) are automatically detected by the test suite and are compiled and run with modules disabled.
This patch also cleans up how the `CXXCompiler` helper class handles enabling/disabling language features.
NOTE: This patch uses `LIT` features which were only committed to LLVM today. If this patch breaks running the libc++ tests you probably need to update LLVM.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@288728 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
