Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chandler Carruth
7c3769df62 Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@351648 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2019-01-19 10:56:40 +00:00
Marshall Clow
64c10d00c3 Implement LWG 2946, 3075 and 3076. Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D48616
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@336132 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2018-07-02 18:41:15 +00:00
Steven Wu
244033db8b Remove XFAIL in implicit_deduction_guides tests
The clang assertion causing these tests failing with sanitizer is fixed
in r295794. All the bots running libcxx tests should be upgraded and
running the compiler with the fix.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@296385 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-02-27 21:10:41 +00:00
Eric Fiselier
224dbbb3d6 Work around Clang assertion when testing C++17 deduction guides with '-g'.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@295417 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-02-17 05:04:09 +00:00
Eric Fiselier
0eaf2e8474 [libc++] Fix PR 31938 - std::basic_string constructors use non-deductible parameter types.
Summary:
This patch fixes http://llvm.org/PR31938. The description below is copy/pasted from the bug:

The standard says:

template<class charT, class traits = char_traits<charT>,
         class Allocator = allocator<charT>>
class basic_string {
  using value_type = typename traits::char_type;
  // ...
  basic_string(const charT* s, const Allocator& a = Allocator());
};

libc++ actually chooses to declare the constructor as

  basic_string(const value_type* s, const Allocator& a = Allocator());

The implicit deduction guides from class template argument deduction make what was previously an implementation detail visible:

std::basic_string s = "foo"; // error, can't deduce charT.

The constructor in question is in the libc++ DSO, but fortunately it looks like fixing this will not result in an ABI break.


@rsmith How does this look? I did more than just the constructors mentioned in the PR, but IDK how far to take it.


Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith

Reviewed By: rsmith

Subscribers: cfe-commits, rsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29863

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@295393 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-02-17 01:17:10 +00:00