There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@367770 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was found to be broken on Clang trunk. This is a revert of the
following commits (the subsequent commits added XFAILs to the tests
that were missing from the original submission):
r362986: Implement deduction guides for map/multimap.
r363014: Add some XFAILs
r363097: Add more XFAILs
r363197: Add even more XFAILs
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@363688 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This used to be guarded on whether the deployment target was greater
than macosx10.8, however testing against the dylibs for 10.8 and earlier
with the function enabled works too. The revision that introduced
__pad_and_output is r164241 and it does not mention a reason for the
guard.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@358677 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The reason libc++ implemented a throwing debug mode handler was for ease of testing. Specifically,
I thought that if a debug violation aborted, we could only test one violation per file. This made
it impossible to test debug mode. Which throwing behavior we could test more!
However, the throwing approach didn't work either, since there are debug violations underneath noexcept
functions. This lead to the introduction of `_NOEXCEPT_DEBUG`, which was only noexcept when debug
mode was off.
Having thought more and having grown wiser, `_NOEXCEPT_DEBUG` was a horrible decision. It was
viral, it didn't cover all the cases it needed to, and it was observable to the user -- at worst
changing the behavior of their program.
This patch removes the throwing debug handler, and rewrites the debug tests using 'fork-ing' style
death tests.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne, thomasanderson
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, arphaman, libcxx-commits, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59166
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@356417 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@351648 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently libc++ defines operator== and operator!= as friend functions in the
definition of the istream_iterator class template. Such definition has a subtle
difference from an out-of-line definition required by the C++ Standard: these
functions can only be found by argument-dependent lookup, but not by qualified
lookup.
This patch changes the definition, so that it conforms to the C++ Standard and
adds a check involving qualified lookup to the test suite.
Patch contributed by Mikhail Maltsev.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40415
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@320363 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Creating a function pointer with proper parameters pointing to std::next() or std::prev() should work.
This change moves the invented paramater for enable_if over to the return type to resolve this QoI issue.
Patch by Jason Liu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34649
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@308932 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
path::iterator isn't a strictly conforming iterator. Specifically
it stashes the current element inside the iterator. This leads to
UB when used with reverse_iterator since it requires the element
to outlive the lifetime of the iterator.
This patch adds a static_assert inside reverse_iterator to disallow
"stashing iterator types", and it tags path::iterator as such a type.
Additionally this patch removes all uses of reverse_iterator<path::iterator>
within the tests.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@300164 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@291035 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Libc++ still uses per-feature configuration macros when configuring for C++11. However libc++ requires a feature-complete C++11 compiler so there is no reason to check individual features. This patch starts the process of removing the feature specific macros and replacing their usage with `_LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG`.
This patch removes the __config macros:
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_TRAILING_RETURN
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_TEMPLATE_ALIASES
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ADVANCED_SFINAE
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_DEFAULT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGS
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_STATIC_ASSERT
As a drive I also changed our C++03 static_assert to use _Static_assert if available.
I plan to commit this without review if nobody voices an objection.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24895
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@282347 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Since at least the C++11 standard insert iterators are specified
as having ::reference typedef void. Libc++ was not doing that.
This patch corrects the typedef.
This patch changes the std::iterator base class of insert_iterator,
front_insert_iterator and back_insert_iterator. This should not
be an ABI breaking change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@274209 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This bug was originally fixed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D7201.
However it was broken again by the fix to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22605.
This patch re-fixes __wrap_iter with GCC by providing a forward declaration of <vector> before the friend declaration in __wrap_iter.
This patch avoids the issues in PR22605 by putting canonical forward declarations in <iosfwd> and including <iosfwd> in <vector>.
<iosfwd> was chosen as the canonical forward declaration headers for the following reasons:
1. `<iosfwd>` is small with almost no dependancies.
2. It already forward declares `std::allocator`
3. It is already included in `<iterator>` which we need to fix the GCC bug.
This patch fixes the test "gcc_workaround.pass.cpp"
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16345
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@261382 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
he following snippet doesn't build when using gcc and libc++:
#include <string>
void f(const std::string& s) { s.begin(); }
#include <vector>
void AppendTo(const std::vector<char>& v) { v.begin(); }
The problem is that __wrap_iter has a private constructor. It lists vector<>
and basic_string<> as friends, but gcc seems to ignore this for vector<> for
some reason. Declaring vector before the friend declaration in __wrap_iter is
enough to work around this problem, so do that. With this patch, I'm able to
build chromium/android with libc++. Without it, two translation units fail to
build. (iosfwd already provides a forward declaration of basic_string.)
As far as I can tell, this is due to a gcc bug, which I filed as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64816.
Fixes PR22355.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7201
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@227226 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
