Libc++ has to deduce the 'allocator_arg_t' parameter as 'AllocArgT' for the
following constructor:
template <class Alloc> tuple(allocator_arg_t, Alloc const&)
Previously libc++ has tried to support tags derived from 'allocator_arg_t' by
using 'is_base_of<AllocArgT, allocator_arg_t>'. However this breaks whenever a
2-tuple contains a reference to an incomplete type as its first parameter.
See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27684
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@273334 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There are two main fixes in this patch.
First the constructor SFINAE was changed so that it's evaluated in two stages
where the first stage evaluates the "safe" SFINAE conditions and the second
evaluates the "dangerous" ones. The key is that the second stage is lazily
evaluated only if the first stage passes. This helps fix PR23256
(https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23256).
The second fix is for PR22806 and LWG issue 2549. This fix applies
the suggested resolution to the LWG issue in order to prevent the construction
of dangling references. The SFINAE for this check is contained within
the _PreferTupleLikeConstructor alias template. The tuple-like constructors
are disabled whenever that trait returns false.
(https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22806)
(http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2549)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@266461 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Currently parts of the SFINAE on tuples default constructor always gets evaluated even when the default constructor is never called or instantiated. This can cause a hard compile error when a tuple is created with types that do not have a default constructor. Below is a self contained example using a pair like class. This code will not compile but probably should.
```
#include <type_traits>
template <class T>
struct IllFormedDefaultImp {
IllFormedDefaultImp(T x) : value(x) {}
constexpr IllFormedDefaultImp() {}
T value;
};
typedef IllFormedDefaultImp<int &> IllFormedDefault;
template <class T, class U>
struct pair
{
template <bool Dummy = true,
class = typename std::enable_if<
std::is_default_constructible<T>::value
&& std::is_default_constructible<U>::value
&& Dummy>::type
>
constexpr pair() : first(), second() {}
pair(T const & t, U const & u) : first(t), second(u) {}
T first;
U second;
};
int main()
{
int x = 1;
IllFormedDefault v(x);
pair<IllFormedDefault, IllFormedDefault> p(v, v);
}
```
One way to fix this is to use `Dummy` in a more involved way in the constructor SFINAE. The following patch fixes these sorts of hard compile errors for tuple.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, K-ballo, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: ldionne, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7569
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@230120 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: No declaration for the type `tuple` is given in c++03 or c++98 modes. Mark all tests that use the actual `tuple` type as UNSUPPORTED.
Reviewers: jroelofs, mclow.lists, danalbert
Reviewed By: danalbert
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5956
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@229808 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
