Files
libcxx/test/std/experimental/optional/optional.object/optional.object.ctor/nullopt_t.pass.cpp
Asiri Rathnayake a3eac518e6 [libcxx] Improve tests to use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive
Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format:
 #if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X
   // Do test.
 #else
   // Empty test.
 #endif
We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on
earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes
for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit
directives on the same tests.

Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists

Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@271108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-05-28 08:57:35 +00:00

64 lines
1.3 KiB
C++

//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// UNSUPPORTED: c++98, c++03, c++11
// <optional>
// constexpr optional(nullopt_t) noexcept;
#include <experimental/optional>
#include <type_traits>
#include <cassert>
using std::experimental::optional;
using std::experimental::nullopt_t;
using std::experimental::nullopt;
template <class Opt>
void
test_constexpr()
{
static_assert(noexcept(Opt(nullopt)), "");
constexpr Opt opt(nullopt);
static_assert(static_cast<bool>(opt) == false, "");
struct test_constexpr_ctor
: public Opt
{
constexpr test_constexpr_ctor() {}
};
}
template <class Opt>
void
test()
{
static_assert(noexcept(Opt(nullopt)), "");
Opt opt(nullopt);
assert(static_cast<bool>(opt) == false);
struct test_constexpr_ctor
: public Opt
{
constexpr test_constexpr_ctor() {}
};
}
struct X
{
X();
};
int main()
{
test_constexpr<optional<int>>();
test_constexpr<optional<int*>>();
test<optional<X>>();
}