Files
libcxx/test/std/experimental/optional/optional.object/optional.object.observe/op_arrow.pass.cpp
Asiri Rathnayake a3eac518e6 [libcxx] Improve tests to use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive
Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format:
 #if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X
   // Do test.
 #else
   // Empty test.
 #endif
We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on
earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes
for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit
directives on the same tests.

Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists

Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@271108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-05-28 08:57:35 +00:00

44 lines
963 B
C++

//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// UNSUPPORTED: c++98, c++03, c++11
// <optional>
// constexpr T* optional<T>::operator->();
#ifdef _LIBCPP_DEBUG
#define _LIBCPP_ASSERT(x, m) ((x) ? (void)0 : std::exit(0))
#endif
#include <experimental/optional>
#include <type_traits>
#include <cassert>
using std::experimental::optional;
struct X
{
constexpr int test() const {return 3;}
};
int main()
{
{
constexpr optional<X> opt(X{});
static_assert(opt->test() == 3, "");
}
#ifdef _LIBCPP_DEBUG
{
optional<X> opt;
assert(opt->test() == 3);
assert(false);
}
#endif // _LIBCPP_DEBUG
}