Files
libcxx/test/std/experimental/optional/optional.object/optional.object.observe/value_const.pass.cpp
Asiri Rathnayake a3eac518e6 [libcxx] Improve tests to use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive
Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format:
 #if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X
   // Do test.
 #else
   // Empty test.
 #endif
We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on
earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes
for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit
directives on the same tests.

Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists

Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@271108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-05-28 08:57:35 +00:00

55 lines
1.2 KiB
C++

//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// UNSUPPORTED: c++98, c++03, c++11
// XFAIL: libcpp-no-exceptions
// <optional>
// constexpr const T& optional<T>::value() const;
#include <experimental/optional>
#include <type_traits>
#include <cassert>
using std::experimental::optional;
using std::experimental::in_place_t;
using std::experimental::in_place;
using std::experimental::bad_optional_access;
struct X
{
X() = default;
X(const X&) = delete;
constexpr int test() const {return 3;}
int test() {return 4;}
};
int main()
{
{
constexpr optional<X> opt(in_place);
static_assert(opt.value().test() == 3, "");
}
{
const optional<X> opt(in_place);
assert(opt.value().test() == 3);
}
{
const optional<X> opt;
try
{
opt.value();
assert(false);
}
catch (const bad_optional_access&)
{
}
}
}