Files
libcxx/test/std/utilities/variant/variant.relops/relops_bool_conv.fail.cpp
Eric Fiselier 989927cc37 Don't require relops on variant alternatives to all return the same
type.

Libc++ correctly asserts that a set of visitors for a variant all
return the same type. However, we use the visitation machinary to
perform relational operations. This causes a static assertion when
some of the alternatives relops return a UDT which is implicitly
convertible to bool instead of 'bool' exactly.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@342560 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2018-09-19 17:53:21 +00:00

89 lines
3.1 KiB
C++

// -*- C++ -*-
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// UNSUPPORTED: c++98, c++03, c++11, c++14
// <variant>
// template <class ...Types>
// constexpr bool
// operator==(variant<Types...> const&, variant<Types...> const&) noexcept;
//
// template <class ...Types>
// constexpr bool
// operator!=(variant<Types...> const&, variant<Types...> const&) noexcept;
//
// template <class ...Types>
// constexpr bool
// operator<(variant<Types...> const&, variant<Types...> const&) noexcept;
//
// template <class ...Types>
// constexpr bool
// operator>(variant<Types...> const&, variant<Types...> const&) noexcept;
//
// template <class ...Types>
// constexpr bool
// operator<=(variant<Types...> const&, variant<Types...> const&) noexcept;
//
// template <class ...Types>
// constexpr bool
// operator>=(variant<Types...> const&, variant<Types...> const&) noexcept;
#include <cassert>
#include <type_traits>
#include <utility>
#include <variant>
#include "test_macros.h"
struct MyBoolExplicit {
bool value;
constexpr explicit MyBoolExplicit(bool v) : value(v) {}
constexpr explicit operator bool() const noexcept { return value; }
};
struct ComparesToMyBoolExplicit {
int value = 0;
};
inline constexpr MyBoolExplicit operator==(const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& LHS, const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& RHS) noexcept {
return MyBoolExplicit(LHS.value == RHS.value);
}
inline constexpr MyBoolExplicit operator!=(const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& LHS, const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& RHS) noexcept {
return MyBoolExplicit(LHS.value != RHS.value);
}
inline constexpr MyBoolExplicit operator<(const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& LHS, const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& RHS) noexcept {
return MyBoolExplicit(LHS.value < RHS.value);
}
inline constexpr MyBoolExplicit operator<=(const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& LHS, const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& RHS) noexcept {
return MyBoolExplicit(LHS.value <= RHS.value);
}
inline constexpr MyBoolExplicit operator>(const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& LHS, const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& RHS) noexcept {
return MyBoolExplicit(LHS.value > RHS.value);
}
inline constexpr MyBoolExplicit operator>=(const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& LHS, const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& RHS) noexcept {
return MyBoolExplicit(LHS.value >= RHS.value);
}
int main() {
using V = std::variant<int, ComparesToMyBoolExplicit>;
V v1(42);
V v2(101);
// expected-error-re@variant:* 6 {{static_assert failed due to requirement 'std::is_convertible{{[^']+}}' "the relational operator does not return a type which is implicitly convertible to bool"}}
// expected-error@variant:* 6 {{no viable conversion}}
(void)(v1 == v2); // expected-note {{here}}
(void)(v1 != v2); // expected-note {{here}}
(void)(v1 < v2); // expected-note {{here}}
(void)(v1 <= v2); // expected-note {{here}}
(void)(v1 > v2); // expected-note {{here}}
(void)(v1 >= v2); // expected-note {{here}}
}