Files
libcxx/test/std/experimental/optional/optional.nullopt/nullopt_t.pass.cpp
Asiri Rathnayake a3eac518e6 [libcxx] Improve tests to use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive
Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format:
 #if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X
   // Do test.
 #else
   // Empty test.
 #endif
We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on
earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes
for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit
directives on the same tests.

Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists

Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@271108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-05-28 08:57:35 +00:00

39 lines
1.0 KiB
C++

//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// UNSUPPORTED: c++98, c++03, c++11
// <optional>
// struct nullopt_t{see below};
// constexpr nullopt_t nullopt(unspecified);
#include <experimental/optional>
#include <type_traits>
using std::experimental::optional;
using std::experimental::nullopt_t;
using std::experimental::nullopt;
constexpr
int
test(const nullopt_t&)
{
return 3;
}
int main()
{
static_assert((std::is_class<nullopt_t>::value), "");
static_assert((std::is_empty<nullopt_t>::value), "");
static_assert((std::is_literal_type<nullopt_t>::value), "");
static_assert((!std::is_default_constructible<nullopt_t>::value), "");
static_assert(test(nullopt) == 3, "");
}