Files
libcxx/test/std/experimental/optional/optional.hash/hash.pass.cpp
Asiri Rathnayake a3eac518e6 [libcxx] Improve tests to use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive
Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format:
 #if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X
   // Do test.
 #else
   // Empty test.
 #endif
We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on
earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes
for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit
directives on the same tests.

Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists

Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@271108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-05-28 08:57:35 +00:00

47 lines
1.2 KiB
C++

//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// UNSUPPORTED: c++98, c++03, c++11
// <optional>
// template <class T> struct hash<optional<T>>;
#include <experimental/optional>
#include <string>
#include <memory>
#include <cassert>
int main()
{
using std::experimental::optional;
{
typedef int T;
optional<T> opt;
assert(std::hash<optional<T>>{}(opt) == 0);
opt = 2;
assert(std::hash<optional<T>>{}(opt) == std::hash<T>{}(*opt));
}
{
typedef std::string T;
optional<T> opt;
assert(std::hash<optional<T>>{}(opt) == 0);
opt = std::string("123");
assert(std::hash<optional<T>>{}(opt) == std::hash<T>{}(*opt));
}
{
typedef std::unique_ptr<int> T;
optional<T> opt;
assert(std::hash<optional<T>>{}(opt) == 0);
opt = std::unique_ptr<int>(new int(3));
assert(std::hash<optional<T>>{}(opt) == std::hash<T>{}(*opt));
}
}