mirror of
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-docs/
synced 2025-05-14 23:39:47 +08:00
164 lines
6.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
164 lines
6.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0
|
|
|
|
.. Copyright (C) 2020 embedded brains GmbH & Co. KG
|
|
|
|
.. _PythonDevelGuide:
|
|
|
|
Python Development Guidelines
|
|
*****************************
|
|
|
|
Python is the preferred programming language for the RTEMS Tools. The RTEMS
|
|
Tools run on the host computer of an RTEMS user or maintainer. These
|
|
guidelines cover the Python language version, the source code formatting, use
|
|
of static analysis tools, type annotations, testing, code coverage, and
|
|
documentation. There are exceptions for existing code and third-party code.
|
|
It is recommended to read the
|
|
`PEP 8 - Style Guide for Python Code <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/>`_
|
|
and the
|
|
`Google Python Style Guide <http://google.github.io/styleguide/pyguide.html>`_.
|
|
|
|
Python Language Versions
|
|
========================
|
|
|
|
Although the official end-of-life of Python 2.7 was on January 1, 2020, the
|
|
RTEMS Project still cares about Python 2.7 compatibility for some tools. Every
|
|
tool provided by the RTEMS Project which an RTEMS user may use to develop
|
|
applications with RTEMS should be Python 2.7 compatible. Examples are the
|
|
build system, the RTEMS Source Builder, and the RTEMS Tester. The rationale is
|
|
that there are still some maintained Linux distributions in the wild which ship
|
|
only Python 2.7 by default. An example is CentOS 7 which gets maintenance
|
|
updates until June 2024. Everything an RTEMS maintainer uses should be written
|
|
in Python 3.6.
|
|
|
|
Python Code Formatting
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
Good looking code is important. Unfortunately, what looks good is a bit
|
|
subjective and varies from developer to developer. Arguing about the code
|
|
format is not productive. Code reviews should focus on more important topics,
|
|
for example functionality, testability, and performance. Fortunately, for
|
|
Python there are some good automatic code formatters available. All new code
|
|
specifically developed for the RTEMS Tools should be piped through the
|
|
`yapf <https://github.com/google/yapf>`_ Python code formatter before it is
|
|
committed or sent for review. Use the default settings of the tool
|
|
(`PEP 8 <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/>`_ coding style).
|
|
|
|
You can disable the automatic formatting by the tool in a region starting with
|
|
the ``#yapf: disable`` comment until the next ``# yapf: enable`` comment, for
|
|
example
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
|
# yapf: disable
|
|
FOO = {
|
|
# ... some very large, complex data literal.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
BAR = [
|
|
# ... another large data literal.
|
|
]
|
|
# yapf: enable
|
|
|
|
For a single literal, you can disable the formatting like this:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
|
BAZ = {
|
|
(1, 2, 3, 4),
|
|
(5, 6, 7, 8),
|
|
(9, 10, 11, 12),
|
|
} # yapf: disable
|
|
|
|
Static Analysis Tools
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
Use the ``flake8`` and ``pylint`` static analysis tools for Python. Do not
|
|
commit your code or send it for review if the tools find some rule
|
|
violations. Run the tools with the default configuration. If you have
|
|
problems to silence the tools, then please ask for help on the :r:list:`devel`.
|
|
Consult the tool documentation to silence false positives.
|
|
|
|
Type Annotations
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
For Python 3.6 or later code use type annotations. All public functions of
|
|
your modules should have `PEP 484 <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/>`_
|
|
type annotations. Check for type issues with the
|
|
`mypy <http://mypy-lang.org/>`_ static type checker.
|
|
|
|
Testing
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
Write tests for your code with the
|
|
`pytest <https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/contents.html>`_ framework. Use the
|
|
`monkeypatch <https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/monkeypatch.html>`_ mocking
|
|
module. Do not use the standard Python ``unittest`` and ``unittest.mock``
|
|
modules. Use ``coverage run -m pytest`` to run the tests with code coverage
|
|
support. If you modify existing code or contribute new code to a subproject
|
|
which uses tests and the code coverage metric, then do not make the code
|
|
coverage worse.
|
|
|
|
Test Organization
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
Do not use test classes to group tests. Use separate files instead. Avoid
|
|
deep test directory hierarchies. For example, place tests for
|
|
:file:`mymodule.py` in :file:`tests/test_mymodule.py`. For class-specific
|
|
tests use:
|
|
|
|
* ``mymodule.py:class First`` :math:`\rightarrow`
|
|
:file:`tests/test_mymodule_first.py`
|
|
|
|
* ``mymodule.py:class Second`` :math:`\rightarrow`
|
|
:file:`tests/test_mymodule_second.py`
|
|
|
|
* ``mymodule.py:class Third`` :math:`\rightarrow`
|
|
:file:`tests/test_mymodule_third.py`
|
|
|
|
You can also group tests in other ways, for example:
|
|
|
|
* :file:`mymodule.py` :math:`\rightarrow` :file:`tests/test_mymodule_input.py`
|
|
|
|
* :file:`mymodule.py` :math:`\rightarrow` :file:`tests/test_mymodule_output.py`
|
|
|
|
Documentation
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
Document your code using the
|
|
`PEP 257 - Docstring Conventions <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0257/>`_.
|
|
Contrary to PEP 257, use the descriptive-style
|
|
(``"""Fetches rows from a Bigtable."""``) instead of imperative-style
|
|
(``"""Fetch rows from a Bigtable."""``) as recommended by
|
|
`Comments and Docstrings - Functions and Methods <http://google.github.io/styleguide/pyguide.html#383-functions-and-methods>`_.
|
|
Use the
|
|
`Sphinx <https://sphinx-rtd-tutorial.readthedocs.io/en/latest/docstrings.html>`_
|
|
format. The
|
|
`sphinx-autodoc-typehints <https://pypi.org/project/sphinx-autodoc-typehints/>`_
|
|
helps to reuse the type annotations for the documentation. Test code does not
|
|
need docstrings in general.
|
|
|
|
Existing Code
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
Existing code in the RTEMS Tools may not follow the preceding guidelines. The
|
|
RTEMS Project welcomes contributions which bring existing code in line with the
|
|
guidelines. Firstly, run the ``yapf`` code formatter through the existing code
|
|
of interest. Add ``# yapf: disable`` comments to avoid reformatting in some
|
|
areas if it makes sense. If the existing code has no unit tests, then add unit
|
|
tests before you modify existing code by hand. With the new unit tests aim at
|
|
a good code coverage especially in the areas you intend to modify. While you
|
|
review the code add docstrings. Run the static analysers and fix the rule
|
|
violations. Please keep in mind that also trivial modifications can break
|
|
working code. Make sure you have some unit tests. Add type annotations unless
|
|
the code should be Python 2.7 compatible. Concentrate on the public
|
|
interfaces.
|
|
|
|
Third-Party Code
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
Try to not modify imported third-party code. In case there are issues with
|
|
third-party code, then at least write a bug report or otherwise contact the
|
|
upstream project. Reimport the third-party code after the issue is fixed in
|
|
the upstream project. Only temporarily modify imported third-party code until
|
|
a solution integrated in the upstream is available.
|